womens nike free run cheap uk jewellery

ï»\xBF, The Supreme Court announced the 'People's Court Supreme People's Court on deepening reform of opinions' (hereinafter referred to as 'Opinion'), built around the key objective of socialism with Chinese characteristics, the power to run the trial system proposed seven aspects 65 key judicial reforms, one of the reforms is the establishment of judicial intervention to prevent the activities of the working mechanism. According to observations, the Supreme Court will cooperate with the central authorities to promote the establishment of leading cadres recording intervention trial implementation activities, to intervene in specific cases handled, reporting and accountability system. In accordance with the case throughout the traces requirements, specifically the trial transcript obligations and responsibilities of the organization for leading cadres to intervene judicial activities, adding instructions, correspondence, records and other information specific cases, the establishment of extraction according to the law, media storage, special library entry, in the volume's copy mechanism, all relevant information shall be deposited in the case n roll, parties and their agents for the inquiry. The reform initiatives in a nutshell is 'interference traces' has a very clear point. Liu Hongyu said, 'traces intervention' is to take the 'intervention' on the next plane to facilitate accountability. 'In the past, when scoring lawyers, investigators frustration that in some cases can not tell you that, within the 'volume' inside. And a lot of the instructions, note in the inside, the parties and lawyers can not know, it can not supervise.' In addition, 'traces intervention' is also conducive to the implementation of judicial accountability. Liu Hongyu said that in some cases face intervention from outside, not sure judges, parties or feel 'energy' are great, really can not be responsible for, the case will be up to consult reporting, the 'ball' kicked to the trial court or executive meeting Authority. After this case collective 'research', there would be no individual responsible for the quality of the case, forming a 'contradiction turned over, no one is responsible' situation. The 'traces' system, all aspects of the intervention is to make traceability easy in hindsight clear responsibility. Beijing Tianda Law Office Republican lawyer Li Jin said, 'traces intervention' is a very necessary system. Leaders say in the case before, we must weigh the relevant consequences. Such supervision can play a role. For investigators, the system allows them to feel at ease down